Commercial Disputes - FAQs
Our helpful Commercial Disputes FAQ page may answer some of your questions.
A contract is an agreement between two parties usually involving the provision of goods or services. Despite popular opinion a contract doesn’t need to be fully written and can also be made by word of mouth or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth.
A standard contract is made up of 5 main elements, which anybody involved in negotiation should always hold at the back of their minds. Remembering that a contract can be made by word of mouth, it’s important not to bind yourself whilst still in negotiation. The five basic elements are:
• Intention to create a legal relationship
• Certainty of terms
In the simplest terms a negotiation becomes an agreement when one party communicates an offer and the other accepts it, for example, one offers a particular service at a certain price and the other replies “yes, that sounds fine”.
Technically yes and if no written contract is made, the Court can consider parties actions in the run up to the agreement as evidence of contract terms. Jarmans always suggests that any contracts, even oral agreements, are then written up as evidence of agreed terms. A written contract is much easier to use as evidence should the need arise.
If you have agreed to write a contract between you it should be standard practice for all parties involved to sign it. Not signing it could be used as evidence that one or more of you didn’t intend to be bound by it. As a standard piece of advice, if a party is refusing to sign a contract, it’s undoubtedly advisable to avoid doing business with them.
Express terms are the terms that have been expressly stated by both parties in the drawing up or agreement of a contract. Implied terms are implied by the court and are based on usage or custom, previous dealings between the two parties, the intention of the parties, common law, and statute.
Under the Limitation Act 1980, the law of limitation is 6 years from the date that the contract is breached.
Depending on the nature of the breach, there are a number of different remedies available. You could claim damages. Damages are a way of ensuring that a party can claim for any loss they’ve suffered as a result of a contract breach. They work to ensure that the injured party can return to the financial position that they would have been in had the contract been completed. However, not all damages can be recovered and, if the breach is significantly serious, it is possible to request to be discharged from the contract instead of or as well as claiming damages.
Alternatively, there is the option of an award of equitable remedies. An order for specific performance, can be awarded by a court which requires a party to perform a positive contract obligation, so, essentially to do what they should have done in the first place. A court may go the other way and request an injunction which can either be prohibitory (ordering that something must not be done) or mandatory (ordering that something must be done).
If the court decides that there has been misrepresentation, a mistake, duress or the contract was created under undue influence, it can order a rescission, which sets aside the contract and puts both parties back to their positions before it was made.
If you believe that you have a commercial dispute or are unsure about whether a contract has been breached, contact our team for some expert legal advice.
I contacted Jarmans Solicitors (Supriya) regarding an employment issue. They were professional, knowledgeable and efficient. I felt fully supported and valued throughout a very difficult period. I would throroughly recommend Jarmans Solicitors and would not hesitate to use them again if needed. The service was exceptional. Thank you.
Omar Behardien Omar Behardien
‘’I've been dealing with Jarmans solicitors over a litigation issue to protect my financial interests within a property I bought with a so-called friend which I owned the highest percentage within the property. The solicitor called Jeanine has been very helpful and supportive and advised me I have a very strong case to stop my so-called friend from taking half my house away from me. I am very happy with the work which has been carried out so far. I
‘’We first contacted Christopher Kennett in April 2020, regarding a boundary dispute as you can appreciate these things if not dealt with correctly can quickly turn nasty. Christopher came to the site so that he completely understood the situation and was not relying on photographs, which can in some cases be misleading. The personal treatment we have received throughout the last year has been fantastic we rely completely on his advice, and put our complete trust in him to always
‘’Great representation in court following road traffic charges - Matt Davis and Jeanine Harry. Very many thanks for your services. Excellent result on the day.’’